Novartis data show achieving complete control of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) improves overall quality of life, as reported by patients
Novartis, a leader in immuno-dermatology and rheumatology, today announced new analysis from a Phase IIb study demonstrating the importance of achieving complete control of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) symptoms in improving overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients1. Complete control of symptoms brings enormous benefit to people with CSU and is associated with improvements in key HRQoL measures such as overall quality of life, sleep interference, activity interference and work impairment1,3. There is a marked decline in these improvements to quality of life even when patients are living with only a low level of CSU symptoms1.
Complete control of CSU symptoms was assessed by a composite of patient reported outcomes (PROs) and was shown to be more likely achieved and sustained with ligelizumab than Xolair??(omalizumab) or placebo2. These data were presented at the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) 30th Anniversary Congress.
CSU is a severe and unpredictable disease of the skin, affecting up to 1% of the global population at any time4. When compared with the general population, patients with CSU are twice as likely to experience difficulty sleeping, anxiety, distress and depression5-7. Many people with CSU do not achieve complete control of signs and symptoms despite using standard-of-care treatments (antihistamines and omalizumab)1,4,8.
The data show that ligelizumab was more likely to provide complete control of CSU symptoms than omalizumab when assessed using a composite of PROs2. A patient free from signs and symptoms of urticaria with concurrent hive severity score (HSS7)=0, itch severity score (ISS7)=0 and angioedema activity score (AAS7)=0 was considered to have CSU completely controlled. Concurrent Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)=0-1 indicated a patient being CSU free2:
- At Week 12, the proportion of patients showing CSU completely controlled was 44.1% with ligelizumab 72 mg (P=0.007 vs omalizumab, and?P=0.003 vs placebo), 40.0% with ligelizumab 240 mg (P=0.025 vs omalizumab, and?P=0.004 vs placebo), 23.5% with omalizumab (P=0.021 vs placebo) and 0.0% with placebo. The proportion of CSU-free patients was 38.1% with ligelizumab 72 mg (P=0.008 vs omalizumab, and?P=0.006 vs placebo), 35.3% with ligelizumab 240 mg (P=0.020 vs omalizumab, and?P=0.007 vs placebo), 18.8% with omalizumab (P=0.035 vs placebo) and 0.0% with placebo.
- At Week 20, the proportion of patients with CSU completely controlled was 33.3%, 34.1%, 25.9% and 4.7%, and for CSU-free patients was 32.1%, 31.8%, 23.5% and 4.7% for ligelizumab 72 mg, 240 mg, omalizumab and placebo, respectively.
- During the treatment-free follow-up period, at Week 28, the proportion of patients remaining CSU free for ligelizumab 72 mg, 240 mg, omalizumab and placebo was 22.8%, 25.0%, 5.3% and 4.9%, respectively.
- Bernstein JA, Gim?nez-Arnau A, Maurer M et al. Complete Symptom Control in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria is associated with an Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life: Data from the Phase 2b Ligelizumab Study. EADV 2021, abstract 1071.
- Gim?nez-Arnau A.M, Bernstein J, Hide M, et al. A composite score combining symptoms with QoL to evaluate complete control of urticaria with ligelizumab. EADV 2021, abstract 705.
- Kanani A, Betschel SD and Warrington R. Urticaria and angioedema.?Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018;14:59.
- Maurer M, Weller K, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. Unmet clinical needs in chronic spontaneous urticaria. A GA(2)LEN task force report.?Allergy.?2011;66:317-30.
- Balp MM, Vietri J, Tian H, et al. The Impact of Chronic Urticaria from the Patient's Perspective: A Survey in Five European Countries.?Patient.?2015;8:551-8.
- Balp MM, Khalil S, Tian H, et al. Burden of chronic urticaria relative to psoriasis in five European countries.?J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.?2018;32:282-290.
- Vietri J, Turner SJ, Tian H, et al. Effect of chronic urticaria on US patients: analysis of the National Health and Wellness Survey.?Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;115:306-11.
- Zuberbier T, Aberer W, Asero R, et al. The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria: the 2013 revision and update.?Allergy.?2014;69:868-87.
- Gasser P, Tarchevskaya SS, Guntern P, et al. The mechanistic and functional profile of the therapeutic anti-IgE antibody ligelizumab differs from omalizumab.?Nat Commun.?2020;11:165.
- Arm JP, Bottoli I, Skerjanec A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of QGE031 (ligelizumab), a novel high-affinity anti-IgE antibody, in atopic subjects.?Clin Exp Allergy.?2014;44:1371-85.
- Maurer M, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Sussman G, et al. Ligelizumab for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.?N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1321-1332.
- ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03580369. A Phase III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab in the Treatment of CSU in Adolescents and Adults Inadequately Controlled with H1-histamines [online] April 2020. Available from:?https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03580369?[Last accessed: September 2021].
- ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03580356. A Phase III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab in the Treatment of CSU in Adolescents and Adults Inadequately Controlled with H1-histamines [online] March 2020. Available from:?https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03580356?[Last accessed: September 2021].